The proposed development described as ’36 dwellings (including 11 affordable units) has been dismissed.
The second of the two reasons for refusal of planning permission concerns the ability of the proposal to adequately deal with surface water drainage. With the Appellant’s statement, a further flood risk assessment and surface water drainage strategy was submitted 1, and in the statement of common ground (para 5.2.8) it is agreed that surface water drainage could be addressed by means of a condition. Accordingly, I consider that the single main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the supply of homes.
James Bond Caravan Site, Moorbarns Lane, Lutterworth