The proposed development of 10 new dwellings and creation of new vehicular access and internal road has been dismissed.
At the outset of the hearing the Council confirmed that the amended drawing submitted by the appellant demonstrates that a safe and suitable access could be achieved subject to the imposition of planning conditions. The Council’s position flows from advice from the Local Highway Authority (LHA) and substantive technical evidence was not presented to counter this. Consequently, I am satisfied this matter has been addressed and therefore it has not been considered further.
During the hearing I sought confirmation regarding the findings of the ecological survey prepared by Geosphere Environmental Ltd (dated 8 December 2016) and submitted by the appellant. In view of the subsequent discussion I have addressed the effect on biodiversity as a main issue. Accordingly, the main issues in this appeal are:
• Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location with reference to development plan policies;
• Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for affordable housing;
• The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape;
• Whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of Kirton Manor, a Grade II listed building;
• The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity; and
• If there is a conflict with the development plan, whether there are material considerations that indicate a decision should be taken other than in accordance with the development plan.
Land Between 73 And 101 Bucklesham Road, Kirton, Suffolk